The death of a major leader in terrorist circles is a plus, but the negative in our calculations is there are more. It isn’t difficult, we imagine, to ‘lead’ a group that essentially causes chaos. There aren’t rules, and regulations don’t apply either. The nature of these groups is they cause harm, and plot and fantasize our demise.
According to popular reports, there are plenty of candidates for this. The promulgation of bad media online also makes it possible for just about anyone to present the potential to be a terrorist leader in waiting. In some circumstances, all it takes is a small advantage over others. It’s enough to set up and takeover the group.
The true nature of terrorism is difficult to understand, but it’s easier to explain if we equate it with another thing. In our past, anarchism is a way of putting it all in perspective. The anarchists of recent and distant history present us with similar, if not the same, issues. They tried to do great harm while also inciting hatred.
What it’s all about
A sort of agitation like this is against an organized state than people at large. It doesn’t make sense to weaken people groups or communities if it isn’t clear who supports the state or not. It’s fair to say the UK has a thriving Muslim community. It’s also not a secret that Islamic ways of thought and lifestyle do well here.
The main point a terrorist is seeking to make is to critique the fashion or organization that a state makes its priority. In some respects, there are differences between state’s a terrorist can highlight, albeit the task involved is divergent. However, the aim of the terrorist is to disrupt to state a case, and not just destroy.
This makes is a threat to all of us, because a way to go about it is to target high profile, important places or areas. It may catch people out that are in agreement with their religious beliefs, but if the moment fits the occasion they’ll pursue it regardless. In their ideology, a sacrifice is worth making if it proves a point in the end.
