EU members are sitting on what they perceive to be a peace-making mandate, but having not being widely involved in world affairs for some time, they can’t count themselves as having a particular policy on it that is a basis for such a claim.
In contrast, America has mastered challenges, such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Iran, with few allies. They’ve built up a foreign policy that is proving results for people and regions in real measure. It’s a standard for outreach internationally, not silence and puffery.
The US is seeking to undermine the very basis of the Iran regime by continuing to say what it sees to be its inherent flaws.
The US itself has never taken a position that stipulates other cultures or races are wrong. It doesn’t have a racist foreign policy.
It does have a guarded account of events, and seeks to understand things as they go. This makes American media accessible, relevant, and transparent as far as it goes in understanding its motives.
Pete Hegseth (US Defence Secretary) speaking about President’s Trump position on Iran as a potential adversary.
However, the hard facts point to a disagreement with the people of Iran insofar as they agree with the ruling leaders and their ultimate conclusions.
These cannot be anti-American in nature or contain life-threatening wording in substance.
What America feels is its responsibility in the region is a question that looms large over any to and fro of arguing. It’s not clear to everyone what threat America feels, and what provocation Iranians see so often.
The case may be that Iran has a doctrine that regards any Western activity as interference in a region it wants to dominate, run, and control from its own power base.
