Public Debate

  • Social media livens up our lives

    The way thoughts come together is showing how people cope with the modern world. The single stream of consciousness from a politician beholden to a party and a ‘main man’ is plain and too simple for an evening of playful consideration.

    The top rated pundits have a conversational outlook that ranges as much as it punches and looks for the next target.

    This is essentially the ‘putting the world right’ crowd that see the pub as their natural environment but engage in the same sort of banter pretty much anywhere else.

    Piers Morgan is an example of this gaming type of attitude. He’s long spent his time onscreen challenging the status quo at every angle and from any seat going. His position on it is to challenge the best and the brightest among us to find holes in their arguments.

    It’s a big ask because the pressure is on and the issues stack up very quickly. His judgement as an editor helps him to pick apart the weakness in people’s postulations and to deliver straight and direct questions to get to the nub of a matter.

    His X profile is an example of someone who is taking aim at the conveyor belt of madness that is pulled across our line of sight by endless newsrooms of liberal ideologues and fanatics.

    His daily ‘chat’ isn’t warfare but an incursion on this terrible diatribe of a culture. He believes that such writers filibuster the system to drive people crazy and push through alternative reforms that people didn’t want and never argue for.

    He can admit – like many of us – that such warring against the same isn’t going to achieve a ramming of common sense through legislation in the opposite direction. But he knows it at least pulls the pints and gets people laughing, too.