Edward Snowden burst onto the international scene as a defector of some size and proportion, and most of it was due to a cultural burst of controversy that hit home relevantly in many different ways.
It’s not understood fully, however, what his move meant technically to his home country, and how it benefited Russia, and may have took some of their advantage away, but not to a significant extent.
Last days
He had been known, according to insiders, as a prolific and habitual reviewer of his own activity. This went against his advice.
He’s alleged to have spent increasing amounts of time looking over his work and attempting to delete, correct, and add to reports that he had made for his superiors.
It was seen to be a sign he was “amiss” in his thoughts, and had been speaking to people outside his home agency, the CIA.
Private doubts
He was a very senior staff member, and had been promoted significantly in its ranks, and given sizeable projects to work with on his own.
The increasing pattern of self-isolation was misinterpreted as an intellectual motivation to focus and seek self-awareness.
He was in fact struggling to balance his long-time secret role to inform Russian agents – and girlfriends – and to keep to his desk in his American role as a professional advisor.
Ideal moves
Edward Snowden’s final and public defection drew international attention, but without much of the merit. Just like others, it’s believed he was not that interesting to Russia after his departure.
As much as they’re a growing international community, choosing to be in Russia against their home States, their inclusions aren’t particularly noticeable, or useful, due to their junior status relative to the country as a whole.
Snowden’s journey only made news because American officials saw him as “comfortable” in America, and “likely to rise higher”, according to one diplomat, so it was a surprise, but not a particularly bad one.