Royalty

  • Westminster Week: Home issues

    Monday

    Lee Dillion MP (Newbury/Liberal Democrats) notes that a lift in a block of flats in his constituency has been left in disrepair for two years. It’s caused inevitable disruption for residents, falling far short of the expectations they have, especially since it’s covered by the services that they pay for.

    Wera Hobhouse (Bath/Liberal Democrats) says a constituent of hers has a leaking roof and isn’t getting any help with it.

    Tuesday

    Prince Andrew (Andrew) is a niggling issue for Politicians. It’s true Parliament has a tried and tested record in dealing with matters, but with Royalty it has flaws in its colours. There’s more than one party aiming for its ‘replacement’, or demise – as much as an effort to represent the needs of some in parts of the Commonwealth as well as to satisfy their own right. But there’s also the matter of how it’s done and what it says.

  • Long Report: Breaking the bank of crime

    The existence of crime is often seen by experts as one large entity. It’s not on the scale of a State, but it may be like a banking institution. There are ‘heads’ that come up as significant figures. The reserves of cash and assets are similar in type to the sorts of crime people do. Their staff are the handlers and exporters of it.

    The ‘clients’ or customers are those that are good at it, but are not a part of the system. They are petty thieves and criminals that have a low level of activity. They cover the ground as it were and daily seek to aggravate and take from society. They benefit from its existence because it means they can do it unhindered by us.

    Under the bus

    The many ‘survivors’ of this sort of nefarious activity feel like they’ve been thrown under a bus. Their savings go. Their children are hurt. Their relationships are strained. It may lead to hardship. It may lead to bankruptcy. It’s the sort of fallout from life that we don’t want to see because it’s a sorry sight. Yet in recent times it’s got significantly worse.

    The numbers, the efficiency, and the secrecy of illegal activity has broken the bank of crime at an unprecedented level in the UK. The Police haven’t been able to keep track, partly because their scope of cover doesn’t extend to the sheer amount of it. The others to blame are the so-called Border ‘experts’ and researchers here that should be hanging their heads in shame.

    Punishing realities

    The work to uncover it and to repair a broken society takes a lot of people and most of the time of every branch of Government. In the meantime, the bank of crime recovers itself. It uses any and all of its resources to harass the staff that do it. They spend all day and night harassing outright the decent, conscientious citizens that are engaged in the recovery of society. They pursue our heroes relentlessly and without any mercy.

    Her Late Majesty said it was a prolonged phenomenon that only belonged to her time because of how big it was in its scale. Her actions led to the safeguarding of important infrastructure that had been threatened by the wasting effect of the terrible foes that walked our streets. Her advice enabled people to work on their own but also in groups to remove the propellers of a scourge of a deeply set criminal decay.

  • Epstein was a master of entrapment

    Notorious people are largely unwanted by the time of their death. This isn’t the case with notable individuals. The true story of Jeffrey Epstein is one of inevitable infamy at the right moment. The truth comes out, and people hate you. This happened with the deceased socialite.

    However, like many other’s who are perverse, he was disliked to begin with. In London, he didn’t fair highly in the social scales. He was known, but as usual, for all the wrong reasons. People couldn’t investigate him because not all people are investigators.

    The fact Epstein had an island meant he was already in flight. This social arrangement makes it difficult for people to find you, regardless of the reason. It’s especially complex for the Police, who then have to file through endless social encounters and occasions to find a strong line of argument.

    The mixing in of different personalities and figures always brings out our real opinions. There are those that are just jealous, envious, or tired of their own position in life. There are still others that are fascinated, curious, or enamoured by it in a simple way.

    The case of Prince Andrew is difficult because he’s never been a senior Royal except in name only. Her Late Majesty trusted him but didn’t set him up as an example. He’s largely hidden in the shadows, coincidentally where most of this type of scandal happens.

    It’s the part of the social order that lives but never really dies. The majority are not involved, but they know about it and have to navigate their way carefully to the right social contacts. This duty of sorts makes it fraught with speculation. It also brings out the liars.

  • The Queen & her people: A disloyal Army

    The Queen (Her Late Majesty) had a very disloyal Army, but they still attended to her to keep up appearances. They marched in public. They lived in the UK as if they had done nothing wrong. They were, in fact, ruining every institution that had a base in this country.

    They threatened every one of her Prime Ministers. They attacked public officials. They kidnapped staff of public institutions. They stole food. They robbed banks. They took children. They burned schools. They trashed cars. In essence, they were a fool card in a full deck.

    The issues transcended normal concerns. It draw widespread criticism and concern everywhere in the world. However, due to selfishness inherent in every nation, no one came to our aid. It was left to the brave people of the country to fight them off. The Army was then slowly and progressively transformed from the inside out.

  • The King strikes a difficult pose

    Monarch’s can’t take us to war, set economic policy, or determine judicial outcomes. They can appear on TV, in a streaming documentary, or on a podcast. This is the sort of engagement King Charles has chosen, and it’s the sort of instruction we get.

    The rest of it is history. The warfare of welfare, the striving of economists, or the struggle of policy hacks is separate. It doesn’t figure in their imagination to engage Royalty. It doesn’t make sense to seek an opinion. The way of the day is to wing it like Netflix.

    This marks a different pose for a Royal Family used to real issues. Her Late Majesty had to navigate troubled waters. The King’s first wife even travelled with her own. The path ahead of a landscaped and rose-lined way is paved with home comforts for a King.

    It doesn’t match the hardship of working it out or the tough decisions that have to be made everyday. The research on the pavement or the surveys in living rooms. This is the sweat and tears of Civil Servants and the odd MP. It’s not fitting for Royals now.

  • Youth Hostels (London Briefing)

    Background

    In London, youth hostels have existed as a concept and a reality for some time. In the years following 2000 it began to become more and more trendy.

    However, there was concern they could be used as an informal network to support criminal activity.

    Perpetrators

    It emerged in some semi-professional circles the youth hostel and backpacking concept had increased in its conceptual value. It was seen as a ‘cool’ way to study society and see the world.

    It was at this time that a particular male suspect alleged to be guilty of crimes in wider Europe was spotted making connections and ‘networking’ his way around a group of people.

    He made a visit to London and stayed in two of its hostels. He was seen having conversations with people. They exchanged mobile numbers. He pledged to make contact.

    Argument

    The male suspect was rumoured to have tried to buy weapons but his lead in Europe broke off contact. This led to erratic behaviour. He drew the attention of European authorities.

    Plan

    He resumed contact with those he met in London, and made repeated attempts to visit the UK. These were frustrated due to suspicions he had begun to work with fraudsters.

    It was learned by former colleagues and friends he was planning to defraud a person of high significance in Europe. This was uncovered to be King Felipe VI, the current King of Spain.

    Threat

    It was found that a few of his accomplices were able to make contact with officials in European banks. This meant his threat was credible, but it was believed it could be averted.

  • Long Report: A state’s long decline

    The way of finding out what the real problem is can be long and winding. It also takes many twists and turns in its plot line to tell the story. The situation one agent found himself in was just such a situation. However, it had to do with a more difficult task than usual.

    The target of investigation was the UK government, a behemoth of an institution that has grown and grown in recent times. Its many millions of staff, interested parties, and stakeholders rightly stretch across the country, yet its problems also tend to do so, too.

    Credibility decline

    Due to crisis after crisis amongst inexperienced MP’s, civil servants hidden away from public view, and a lot of other strange and unknown characters moving in and out of government circles, a more intrusive form of research was needed to establish what was going on.

    An intelligence officer was sent to look into the matter. In the years that followed he was thrown into a trial of perseverance and hard work that led to disillusionment with corrupt, liberal business figures who also intervened and created a huge deal of confusion.

    These aforementioned characters used their friends and allies as armour bearers. In the sense of using them to rough people up and intimidate people to make sure they got what they wanted. The reason they did this is that their goals were unrelated to their work.

    Cold sets in

    The officer was unpaid for 20 years, even though he was a key intelligence worker. There were departments of state that refused to pay, and dishonest employees tried to draw it. There were payments stopped, ended, and prosecutions attempted to take more.

    He was harassed by state-backed media, government employees, and scrounging royalty who embarrassed us in front of overseas dignitaries in their open attempt to denigrate him. It became clear they have a policy of denying dignity, human rights, and integrity.

    It wasn’t helped by a feeling of misguided political bearing by senior royal figures, whose untimely interventions meant that important work was put aside to deal with later on. It meant that some missions were nearly missed, and facts were nearly overlooked.

    Headless chickens

    There were also complications due to bankrupt policies of the nations only formalised religious group, the Church of England. Their worded attempts at changing the direction and form of government also meant people were distracted from key work.

    In this situation, too much emphasis is put on personal position. It means overreach is a more frequent problem than people imagine. It means personalities gain importance and contributions to discussions are diminished as a result. It distorts ethics overall.

    The officer witnessed a decline into irrelevance. There were erroneous acts carried out by senior government staff, and a lack of preparedness became clear across all government functions. In some, a legacy of unpaid bills built up in staffed government buildings.

    Turning soil

    A tendency in newer governments is to overshoot an actual position, to make assertions that are unscientific in the sense of political science, and to run very muddled payroll departments. It’s the outcome of a misguided, can-do mentality which neglects reality.

    The intelligence officer reported a core problem was a belief in unlimited potential. He was also targeted as a way to do and get more. He heard people reasoning they just needed to have the power to do more even though they already had work to do.

    Maybe it was just boring for them to begin with, but the agent was struggling hugely and didn’t have the power to improve their productivity anyway. It was also apparent that volunteers brought in to help began to make the same mistakes as they did, too.

    Ending well

    The agent looked for help, but members of the public close to the action also failed in their basic civic duties. He found they didn’t want to handle other people’s problems, and they attempted to tame, reason with, or put off those that asked for help.

    In his attempt to keep morale, and to achieve the mission, the agent carried on and followed through with every duty he got. He also ignored not getting paid. The situation was brought under control, and order was restored into the state of things.

  • Harry vs. Trump?

    The saga of Prince Harry’s life is alleged to take a turn soon.

    The election of Donald Trump puts back into focus a President who hasn’t got the nicest of things to say about him.

    In a time when royalty rides off nice things being said, it’s not a good outlook.

    Neither are the articles that damn him for choosing a TV actress who doesn’t act that well.

  • Exposed: Disloyal service

    It isn’t a polite story or a good tale to tell the grandchildren. To believe that disloyalty once worked at the heart of the nation’s Palace is unsettling.

    We expect loyalty in those who serve. If it doesn’t seem real at times there is still importance attached to being known if not being great. This is the predicament the late Queen Elizabeth 2nd found herself in.

    It happened on a quiet evening one week in a year that was relatively calm for her late Majesty.

    A monarch goes through years that are tumultuous on the high seas and others that are relatively calm on the expanse of diplomacy that also takes up her time.

    In this instance it was discovered a servant cum aide had been plotting against her. It wasn’t a plot to assassinate or to depose her.

    It was more nuanced than such plots may be.

    The person in question had been at the heart of her household of service for many years. He wasn’t a key figure or partner in the operations of the household but he certainly knew proximity and enjoyed a few short conversations with her here and there.

    He knew his boss as much as he knew his masters business.

    He had a different sort of ‘payroll’ agreement with others who wanted him to gain leverage with her late Majesty over a particular issue.

    He wasn’t to threaten her but just insinuate that a loss of reputation may result if she did not comply with his request. It was something her late Majesty was able to deal with completely.

    However, it was still a shock.