UK Royalty

  • Her late Majesty faced many perils of her own

    Security is becoming a major feature of consultations in central government and is also a main focus of attention for many others. The deliberations are difficult because it’s such a complex sector that is also full of its own faults and flaws.

    However, in the UK we have begun to develop our own workarounds that enable us to come out with solutions that are practical and workable in public places.

    This fits the need at the moment – and in the time that we’re living in – because we’re not ready to tolerate disaster or accept chaos as a part of our normal, everyday lives here.

    By example, it’s believed Her late Majesty faced 152 occasions on which her life was challenged. This means Queen Elizabeth II was targeted more than any other person on our rolls, or among our population.

    The drivenness of some people is difficult to comprehend, but it’s not impossible to overcome. We’ve learned a lot of corporate lessons and have in place a lot of fixes that cover for further eventualities.

  • It’s likely Epstein was trusted – but as an unknown

    Jeffrey Epstein’s emails have so far revealed an overactive mind and yet scant detail of specific sexual activity. These matters are left to other communications that take place between pimps, clients, and customers who make up the real remit of a sex selling activity.

    The implication of global, business, and political figures has only gone so far as to reveal a wide network of large corporate and financial interests spanning continents. These individuals aren’t guilty of sex crimes and therefore have no apology to make because of this fact only.

    The spurious claims that Prince Andrew, for example, had bought in to such a sex scandal deserves to be consigned to the recycle bin of historical narrative. He’s as guilty as any of us, placed in the centre because of an obsessive – and almighty – media clique that trails his life daily for more cuts for print.

    Jeffrey Epstein comes across as a financial figure that had more to hide in the shadows than most. It’s clear that he shouldn’t have been as trusted as he was, and inducements to give him sensitive information were worthy of being refused, more than most, but it took time for his true colours to finally be revealed.

  • King pulls no punches on new Iranian leader

    The King is not known for launching tirades against individuals. He prefers to make short statements about them to setup the context of what he might think, say or do later, depending on the event or the circumstances.

    Mojtaba Khamenei, the latest Supreme Leader of Iran, is described by him as a “Hitler in the Middle East”, a leader that shows no signs of wanting peace, and only builds to dominate others.

    This shortens the lifespan of any great design or idea to ingratiate the Persian country here. Their culture may be of interest, or their religious practice and family life, but politically the situation is much less interesting to us.

  • The King & his people: Stepping out

    Marking yourself out on film is something that King Charles has been able to hone over a long period of time, in particular respect of looking at his late mother and how she presented herself and portrayed her reign on television and in photographs.

    It’s been clear from the start that His Majesty has wanted to put himself front and centre. It’s so that people remember that he says things for their benefit, not just so that he’s heard and known to have spoken about a matter.

    In our time, finally settling on somebody to say things authoritatively has become a preoccupation of many people online. It’s not always the right choice and sometimes there are consequences. However, the King himself has shown great responsibility in regard to this effort himself.

    He isn’t known as being argumentative and if he says something off the cuff in public it’s usually said in good humour and kept to the point. His latest filming effort with Amazon Prime is a good example of this approach and it continues to bolster his respect worldwide.

  • King Charles: Domestic terror charge

    In a sensational exclusive for Conservative News Site, King Charles is now accused of operating a domestic terror network.

    He’s alleged to fund it. It targets public bodies and public institutions. It raids budgets.

    It robs large single estates.

  • Found: Princess Charlotte kidnap evidence

    In an exclusive for Conservative News Site, a key piece of evidence has been located that further implicates a number of individuals in kidnap plots against Princess Charlotte.

    A discarded jacket

    A jacket fitting a young girl used to belong to the Princess. It was taken as a “Trophy” before kidnap plots unfolded. The suspects were seeking reasons for keeping her captive overseas.

  • Exclusive: Prince William’s new girlfriend

    It’s believed Lady Charlotte Wellesley is Prince William’s new girlfriend. This follows a formal separation prior to departure for Princess Catherine (as she’s presently known).

  • Prince William said to be in love

    Prince William is said to have found a new partner. This is according to private Royal sources. They’ve said privacy is important at the present time.

    It’s not understood if a divorce settlement has been reached. It’s believed this type of discussion is a routine.

  • Revealed: “Camp Buckingham”

    There is a truth in the UK countryside that what you hear is probably what you’re going to get.

    The people I’ve spoken to in particular places are fairly certain it’s the case and early on in my investigations into their life and problems as it were, it was found to be true.

    The forebodings they had were actually feelings of fear.

    These were not omens but intuitive thoughts about the future. It was also based on fact, because in such rural areas there’s a lot being said about what needs to be done.

    There was a camp once held in the south of England, in Wiltshire, called “Camp Buckingham” and this was a particularly important event.

    It was actually called a “meet”, which I believe is a piece of terminology understood across the country. It implies a gathering of separate causes under a new, single banner that’s supposed to represent a purpose.

    This “meet” was going to become the foundation of a reaction to a sort of monarchy that was evolving fast on its feet.

    It’s clear her late majesty Elizabeth 2nd walked purposefully, proudly and patiently. It’s also apparent people still took offence at her doing this, at her meeting, greeting, and talking to her people. It was a source of offence also.

    There’s a sort of nimbyism about royalty too, here.

    It wasn’t fair to describe her in the ways they did, and as the emerging Prince Charles took office too, it becomes clearer that anti-monarchists are not fair at all.

    Their objections don’t ring true at all today.

    The fist punching and rousing speeches of “Camp Buckingham” lasted as long as they were spoken. The dust settled and people got back to being as nasty and cold as they were before.

    It didn’t warm them, soften them, or smooth off the edges, but made their thoughts even sharper. It’s a sort of objectionable attitude that lives only because it lives alone.