Ukraine

  • What now for Ukraine?

    The Ukraine war is a moment of reckoning for Europe because beforehand we felt things were safe.

    Many in high European circles felt that Russia was pacified and that war was not possible. In their eyes, it was the only option and had been since the Second World War.

    The assault on Ukraine is therefore a wakeup call but even now it’s not clear how many should be worried about it.

    There’s obviously a strong reaction to any threat to the security of Europe.

    The Second World War was a costly exercise. Its level of sacrifice continues to have a profound effect on us today, leaving us in a truly defensive mode.

    What we’re willing to do is a first test of structure and integrity.

    NATO juggles its responsibilities as a public exercise. It hasn’t made strong moves against Russia. Its members are largely absent.

    European nations have struggles of their own, being unwilling to drop everything to fight a Russian phantom for Ukraine. It harks back but doesn’t make sense.

    Ukraine has to win but maybe it will happen on its own terms. The ‘boots on the ground’ are Ukrainians seeking an urgent reset for their ambitions.

    If this works Europe has proved that the free world is a place of conclusion for nefarious intent. Any plan of Putin can take a back seat in the great scheme of things.

  • Even discussions are a tricky act in Europe right now

    Russian diplomacy is so far not understood in all parts of the world, but it’s getting there for some countries. They get that it takes time. They see that Russian diplomats have much more in mind that can fit into one meeting alone. They also know that what’s spoken is not all that can be said by any stretch.

    It’s believed that Russia is gearing up for a powerhouse set of diplomacy that will enable its ‘rights’ in new ways, but only as it sees fit and thinks it should be done. A source has commented that one aide to a Russian diplomat has said, “It’s too much – for now”. This means the war has complicated matters back home for some Generals, and it looks to be going no further.

    Putin himself has always thought Russia to be a big state, and in conversation with his negotiators – of which there are many teams – he’s been pessimistic, but also cautious, saying, “But I’ll see…”, in response to an air of negativity. He doesn’t want to think it’s not possible.

    This also implies Putin still thinks of himself as the “Big Communicator”, as one diplomat put it to me in a brief conversation before he caught a train from London. The nickname is indicative of a personal and professional tendency to want to be at the centre of the discussion, and to hinge it all on himself.

    Meanwhile, President Zelenskyy of Ukraine is a pragmatist, but says he’s a realist, as if to correct ever so slightly a misapprehension of himself. Upon meeting him he came across as sharp, but not difficult. He doesn’t try to be a Politician, unless you want him to be (which usually comes with a broad enough question).

    He has a humanistic view of life, and that means he sees people breathing, not living. He said of heaven that it’s his chance to “meet the more mature”, meaning he knows he’s young in the faith that saves Ukraine from a bitter Russian oppression. His original intention for a potential war was to name it “Humanity In Ukraine”, but decided against it because he knows how brutal Russia can be. It’s his comedic side coming out, for sure.

    His dichotomy of Ukraine and Russia is unflattering for the former and nostalgic in the latter. He says “Putin inhabits the undergrowth”, meaning that dirty tricks and underhanded tactics are more his style, than a professionalism gained in previously working in Intelligence circles. Ukraine, by contrast, is a picture of familial unity, saying of children, “They just love each other, like bears.” It may also suggest a roguishness that binds them stronger together for a battle than hatred of the other.

    It isn’t ideal for negotiations, then, as the two are pitted against each together as equally strong personalities in an almighty tug of war, either having opposing teams that will stop at nothing to appear the best. It’s a stage set for a settlement between an authoritarian regime and a democratic earnestness. It’s not an easy one to call.

  • Putin wants all out-war, but Ukraine can save the day

    As Putin launched his invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, it was thought that it would result in the annexation of some territories to the State of Russia as a way of placating the admittedly more powerful adversary. It would result only in pro-Russian areas ceding ‘back’ to a Moscow-based rule as a sort of homage, while Ukraine regained itself as a much smaller player on the world stage, also minus some regions it could have held onto.

    It’s thought that this is how Putin sees things, and possibly many others across the world. His perspective is that Russian ‘might’ eclipses the West, and that a return of people’s as it were would show it. It would prove in one go that Russia is better than Ukraine – and that Europe better take notice of it.

    President Putin speaks about the start of his country’s war against Ukraine, stating it’s a matter of life and death.

    The trouble is that Russia has stages to its progress, as it has shown in other ways. While many have dreamed of global domination, its place is to worship the position that one can hold in this way. It’s not necessary to subjugate the world. The only important duty is to hold it in possession as a form of influence, or in a de facto treaty with it.

    The end of the Ukraine conflict in such a way is not a settlement of the matter at all. An increase of power for Moscow – as it would be – could only result in a further bitter confrontation with Europe, and then still further measures. It’s the only reality. Russia seeks now to build itself up into a force much similar to America or indeed China, to rule over Europe as a parent.

    It’s an early start of a renewed push by Moscow elites to gain a better advantage over Europe, to see what it can do and to flex its muscles in more modern ways. The challenge is formiddable, but Europe can overcome it – if it takes it seriously, that is. The chances of that are not good, considering the divided nature of even NATO-style diplomacy, but if Ukraine keeps it under control, the future may be different.

  • Ukraine is fighting a hard ground war

    The likelihood of Russia allowing Ukraine any inch in their marathon battle against Kyiv is low in the great scheme of things.

    Russian strategists have often stated in public and in private that such allowances are illusions in warfare.

    They may sound fair about things beforehand, but during the proceedings Generals in Russia are also known as being ruthless.

    Footage posted in November 2025 to a social chat app showing two Ukraine soldiers fighting for their lives. (Russia vs Ukraine war footage/Telegram)

    The mindset of the aggressor is a key to understanding the next stages of any conflict. It determines the outcome of preparations on the front of the defensive.

    However, the surge in support by new strategy, fresh eyes, or surprise data is of incalculable value to those that have to do the heavy lifting, as it’s proved in Ukraine.

    The daily ramifications of having to fight are part of the true test of character for soldiers, but modern warfare is a much different physical game than before.

  • The US needs to be careful

    The ceding of Ukrainian land to Russia is not a compromise most in the West actually want to see. This is the nightmare scenario many have long dreamed of.

    It cannot happen because Russia benefits from such a move, and many others lose out because of it.

    It’s the same as America pulling out of its areas of interest around the world, resulting in such a catastrophic loss of influence, and some measure of control.

    This is the problem that America finds itself in, as does Ukraine, as it seeks to define itself as a State while keeping its border strong against and alongside a resurgent Russia.

  • Zelenskyy runs the risk of a world war

    The Ukraine war with Russia – or rather, Russia’s war with Ukraine – is beset with obstacles. There are a large number of sensitive issues at play. There are significant interests in the region that are tinder boxes for recriminations. There is a multiplicity of competing forces only held back by Ukrainian sovereignty and Russian dignity, or at least the struggle by both for either.

    This makes it so volatile that any controversial thing spoken may be tantamount to an escalation of tensions. Therefore, the advice of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the world to pile in to get involved is worrying. He calls on help from all four corners of the world to repel an invasion, but in doing so invokes the approach of the World Wars.

    “That is why only pressure can stop this war. Pressure that is multidirectional. The pressure from Western countries today is not enough. Nor is there enough unity in applying that pressure. We need more pressure from the United States, more pressure from Europe. As for the Global South – we do not yet even feel their pressure on Russia to make it stop.”

    It cannot become as worse for a much smaller prize. Putin may be a warmonger, and a tyrannical political leader, but he’s not a token of radicalism. He hasn’t got designs on much of the world and he cannot be credited with disturbing its order. Russia’s reach is not so vast. The answer is to deny them their advance so that nothing is open to win. Ukraine needs to hold its own.

  • Putin is aiming for a perfect settlement

    Russia says its invasion of Ukraine is to stop a threat to its own national security. However, it’s not just a violation of sovereign territory, but it’s also a call for the cessation of a democratic Ukraine. To many Ukrainians, democracy is still new there and it threatens it.

    Putin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov says the Russian invasion is a national security effort.

    It’s accepted the uncertainty of it is far removed from the problems of other Western powers. The bombardment isn’t like a volley of awkward questions from reporters. It’s more of a fundamental test of resolve. It challenges – and reshapes – national character.

    Putin’s challenge in the effort is a zero-sum game in his eyes. He doesn’t see compromise as necessary to a victory, and agreements may threaten to diminish potential outcomes. It’s a war of perfect returns. He wants a safer Russia and this is how he gets it.

  • Westminster Week: Trying times

    Monday

    Iain Duncan Smith MP (Chingford & Woodford Green/Conservatives) stood up for Ukraine, stating to “split” it would be “mad”. There’s a general feeling in the Commons Ukraine needs to win.

    Wednesday

    Kemi Badenoch MP (North West Sussex/Conservatives)said President Zelenskyy is “keeping a cool head under very difficult circumstances”. I’m not sure she got the memo.

    Thursday

    Polly Billington MP (East Thanet/Labour) marked this Saturday’s International Women’s Day with the phrase “housing, housing, housing”, telling the Chamber how important it is to the welfare of women.

  • Westminster Week: Conservatives surge ahead

    Monday

    Monday is a rough start to a week in most cases, but Nigel Farage MP (Clacton/Reform UK) got off to a running start, as well as Richard Tice MP (Boston and Skegness/Reform UK). They both appeared at a branded and fronted press conference in London to launch a broadside against Greater Manchester Police. Their effort was to bring up the beating of a police officer or two in an airport there, and the leaking of subsequent video footage.

    Later on, they both appeared in a debate in the House of Commons over the Chagos Islands, sparing with David Lammy MP (Tottenham/Labour) Foreign Secretary, over the rights and wrongs of it all (the UK recently announced a handover of sovereignty back to the Islands). They obviously feel passionately about it.

    In the evening, they graced us with a launch of a relatively new feature in their repertoire – a party political broadcast. It’s novel for them because it doesn’t quite make sense circa a year ago. I get the sense they can’t believe, having been at it for so long, it’s now their opportunity to reach out on television cold turkey.

    Tuesday

    Tom Tugendhat MP (Tonbridge/Conservatives) was kicked out of the Tory leadership race. It’s not a bad end to a long-running, populous campaign that started with six. It’s now down to three.

    The remaining candidates all put up a good fight, but James Cleverly MP’s campaign (Braintree/Conservatives) has surged ahead and may be the likely one to win. However, we have to watch this space.

    Wednesday

    Perhaps politics can be a bag of surprises, and considering James Cleverly MP (Braintree/Conservatives) was kicked out of the Tory leadership contest today, maybe we need to be reminded it sometimes happens overnight. It’s not to say his supporters are wrong but it’s a question of what Conservatives are looking for right now.

    Thursday

    President Zelenskyy visited London today, not to pay his respects to our political system, but to meet with the Prime Minister to allegedly discuss his “Victory Plan” in the war against Russia. As it happens, London is a busy day for a visit like this, so it’s interesting to see important-looking people in the usual hive of activity.

  • Exposed: Fugitive political strategist

    In a groundbreaking operation a suspect has been spotted in central London following an international sting effort.

    He is known as a political strategist of sorts who also holds unofficial positions of influence in key areas usually designated only to important persons in the so-called military industrial complex.

    However, in particular places he’s wielded significant manipulative influence in terms of advice given and sought.

    He remained at large until today when a positive ID was enabled to be achieved outside the gates of 10 Downing Street in central London.