War

  • Ukraine has shown its way with war – and it works

    The State of Ukraine is beating at the gates of a country that has a full appraisal of itself in many ways. Russia has left no time to waste in covering every corner of its territory, making sure that nothing is left as a mystery to itself.

    Such mastery of its own affairs is an achievement but it can only be respected by itself. The use of it, as well as the reputations of its schools of science and military affairs, draw disdain from many in the wider international community.

    Ukraine has developed its own innovations at a pace, making production a cornerstone of its defensive capabilities. To do this they’ve required the input of a large number of nations. This has come about in terms of finance and firepower, often keeping the enemy at bay at needful times.

    The progress of this war has been hard to follow, because it looks like a two-way fight, and precious few indicators show who’s responsible for what otherwise. We can guess the larger powers are making the most impact, but it’s left to others to tell the story about this.

    Yet, in the silence of these facts it’s become a war effort of promise because Ukraine is ready for the battle as it turns on itself. The people of Ukraine have shown a willingness to keep at the frontlines and trust in the promises of others. This is a noble spirit for all to see.

    The advancement of techniques in fighting has now cemented a new reaction to hostile efforts to takeover and to control. The political drive of Putin is a mania that adds complex toxicity to the battlefield, and modern technology handles this far better than human minds, which slow in the calculation of it.

    In our times there’s a sense of optimism that old styles of aggression that go after things not a part of our modern hopes are not all-encompassing – or inevitable. They can be repudiated in favour of a new arrangement, idea, or concept that keeps its own ground.

  • An Iran war is a matter for Iranian people

    The implications of strikes on Iran are being considered across Western media cycles, and the output seems to be a concern about shipping and something on the cost of living. There’s clearly little to nothing there for evidence to use to back up a significant claim as to the meaning of why it’s happening. These are just things that confirm it’s real.

    The real story is one for the Iranian people, put there for their consideration over the lifecycle of a leader and what it means when other people are threatened. The lesson is sobering, as much as the loss of such an iconic leader is a shock. This must be the point at which thinking starts on its context, and purpose.

    The further escalation of hostilities is a decision that people make with their leader, albeit in Iran it may be a much smaller number that is involved in the process. This is set in the international framework as a necessary response if things are to get worse, or deteriorate into a conflict that runs until it ends, rather than when life stops totally.

    The upswell of support for the new Supreme Leader, or a wave of enrolment for local forces that offer the feeling of patriotism and a cause worth being martyred for, is set in the nervous system of the State of Iran, emerging if it feels compelling and worth doing so. This is also their side of the story, and not ours.

  • Ukraine’s safe option is to evacuate its border areas

    The progress of diplomacy is slow when it comes to the stubbornness of Russia. It’s been shown that it speeds up exponentially where there is a meaningful aim in sight and something can be gained from a continuation of the talks. It has to refer directly to something that has been stated before, even if it doesn’t fully realise it’s dream.

    In terms of the land that Russia wants to have in its own possession, Ukraine stands at a crossroads in its own decision-making. Its best option is to evacuate such areas and to maintain that nothing more than a small contingent should continue to live there. It gives Russia ground but deprives it of a further reach to limit closeness to Ukraine.

    The evacuation of people is not a popular option, but it could be satisfied in either direction. A non-contingency zone like this could be a solution to a battle between two powers, one that has moral argument and another that has sufficient strength to resist more.

    It may give Russians pride in saying that named places are ‘back’ in its own possession. However, it recognises that its own expansionism is an unpopular policy. It cannot take more to gain more in the long-term, and Ukraine has to be guaranteed its own internal security.

  • Iran has divides that cannot be overcome

    Iran is usually spoken of as being one single and whole country. While this is true – and is useful in a business sense – in terms of its leadership this couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s the belief of many academics that there are artificial divisions that are somehow run through Iranian society to keep people separate.

    These were built up by its former Supreme Leader and is believed to be a large part of the inheritance of the new Supreme Leader, who has to manage this new status quo.

    It’s likely these lines are obvious and that many people are aware it involves more than stating facts and enforcing it by Policing. This means that while some countries have sought to develop upward, Iran has moved to press outwards. It follows in a long period of overtly proud planning and behaviour.

    This causes Iran to be an increasing mystery on the world stage. As a State in the Middle East that’s choosing to be ever more introverted in its way of politics and life, it presents a threat through not being understood, but this is now built-in to its approach to being both a country and a regional power.

    The challenge from outside to Iranian leadership is therefore not seen as being relevant. It’s also more and more difficult to challenge a human rights record where their social setup is fragmented in such a way to make it difficult to know who is responsible and how life works there.

    Their opinions are probably going to be singular but their action is not going to be as predictable as we’d like it to be. It’s also not a forgone conclusion what Iran wants or what more they want to achieve.

  • Iran rarely strikes at the middle ground

    Iran isn’t known for being a friend of many nations across the world. It hasn’t got a collegiate tradition or an evangelical culture in either its schools of preparation or in its fields of play.

    It makes it a hard country to understand, and many fail at this as they try by themselves.

    In actual fact, nations must engage and coordinate to find common understanding between each other, and in this scheme of things Iran has few partners and all of these are regional.


    “Friendly and brotherly nations find each other in hard times, and the deeper the civilizational roots, the stronger this bond.”

    President Masoud Pezeshkian/X.


    It also guards such relationships closely. Many top level officials concede that instead of extending a hand of friendship, they prefer to come out swinging.

    If a new partnership is suggested that is too meaningful in some way, to begin with, they respond in the opposite sense.

    America hasn’t got a lot of rope to use, and we definitely shouldn’t try either. The rest is internal, and many hope the matters are resolved by Iranians capable of guiding matters by themselves.

  • Westminster Week: On trial

    Tuesday

    “Jury trials are a cornerstone of our democracy, and Justice system,” so says Imran Hussain MP (Bradford East/Labour), passionate in his appeal to the Secretary of State for Justice. He hopes it stays, while others hope it goes.

    Jim Shannon MP (Strangford/DUP) says the quality of the law is now paramount, saying “speed cannot come at the expense of fundamental rights” and jury trials must stay for the sake of it.

    Wednesday

    The Prime Minister says the Leader of the Opposition “totally abandoned her position” on the idea of the UK joining the US to fight Iran, calling it a “mother of all u-turns” on “one of the most important [-] decisions” a leader like him will face. The other, of course, is the one about staying or going.

  • Ukraine fights hard in word and deed

    Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy has come out fighting against Russian misinformation on many occasions to defend his country’s record and to offer insight to a worldwide audience. It’s not easy reading because he has to state things that are true that many people say are not and use to abuse him.

    This is the nature of politics and of the real world. He knows it and he uses his platform to this advantage. He’s a responsible technician of words and has the acute sensibility needed of a leader. His people benefit widely by his advice and no doubt he has saved Ukrainian lives.


    “Fuck away to Russia. Go home. You don’t respect anybody in the United States. You don’t respect the rules. You don’t respect democracy. You don’t respect Ukraine or Europe. Go home.”

    @ZelenskyyUa/X


    The future is a binding contract with the people, however, and he needs to focus. His country demands democracy – and more leadership. He has to change tact as soon as he’s asked to. His forward efforts are crucial now to a change of tone and of footing against Russia.

    The State of Ukraine won’t go down to live under the hand of Russia. It will have to prevail, though, by fighting hard until the end. It has to bring this war to an end as the responsible opposing force. The weight of history is behind it, but it must use it intelligently.

  • Russia’s aggression is historic in character, but not in nature

    The belief that the Russian army is barbaric today is built up on the prior involvement of Wagner which had elements that were described as being plainly illegal by international observers before the war.

    The offset of Wagner as a military contribution has not dampened the spirits of Russia for a military victory in Ukraine. In fact it’s left to more native forces to pursue the end goal that is still in mind.

    Videos of Russian aggression – posted in 2022 – that shows limited use of powerful weapons. (Source: russia_ukraine7/Telegram).

    The use of some types of technology has come across in media reports so far and available footage on social media also shows the same uses of these. However, it’s not certain if Russia is going to use its more powerful weaponry.

    The hallmarks of a real war are there but Russia has yet to deal heavy blows that would make Ukraine think again about its chances. It may be a tactic or it may be failures at home that are causing this to be so. The way forward is uncertain. 

  • Russia and Cuba pal up again

    The Russia-Ukraine war is striking deep divisions into the soil of international relations, and yet Russia is striving to make further incisions.

    The recent ratification by Russia’s Federation Council of an agreement for an exploration of strategic ties with Cuba is a haunting echo of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

    It’s also a show of contempt for the efforts of world leaders to make peace today. The old Russia makes new waves in a modern facade of a warmongering nation.

  • Zelenskyy runs the risk of a world war

    The Ukraine war with Russia – or rather, Russia’s war with Ukraine – is beset with obstacles. There are a large number of sensitive issues at play. There are significant interests in the region that are tinder boxes for recriminations. There is a multiplicity of competing forces only held back by Ukrainian sovereignty and Russian dignity, or at least the struggle by both for either.

    This makes it so volatile that any controversial thing spoken may be tantamount to an escalation of tensions. Therefore, the advice of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the world to pile in to get involved is worrying. He calls on help from all four corners of the world to repel an invasion, but in doing so invokes the approach of the World Wars.

    “That is why only pressure can stop this war. Pressure that is multidirectional. The pressure from Western countries today is not enough. Nor is there enough unity in applying that pressure. We need more pressure from the United States, more pressure from Europe. As for the Global South – we do not yet even feel their pressure on Russia to make it stop.”

    It cannot become as worse for a much smaller prize. Putin may be a warmonger, and a tyrannical political leader, but he’s not a token of radicalism. He hasn’t got designs on much of the world and he cannot be credited with disturbing its order. Russia’s reach is not so vast. The answer is to deny them their advance so that nothing is open to win. Ukraine needs to hold its own.

  • World exclusive: Gaza Mercenary-Commander

    In a world exclusive for ConservativeNewsSite.com, it can be revealed a Mercenary-Commander with “Effective Control” over the territory of Gaza has been located. He’s believed to be French-born, although his exact biographical details cannot be shared here. This is due to ongoing investigation.

    The nature of the work in Gaza involves its status as a quasi-military camp. This involves the participation of many different types of sources of military help. Its activity is therefore in the line of mercenary defence, rather than civilian or even humanitarian. It’s opposed to legitimate democratic control.

    Much of the planning took place in London.This involved participation of high level military figures in the UK. Due to the involvement of these people, such details of the meetings cannot be related. It means much of the fighting – and infighting – in Gaza is due to power plays with different groups.

  • Israel faces a battle in England

    Israel is a nation at tentative peace with itself. In diplomatic terms the incursion into Gaza cost it extensively. The popular opinion weighs heavily on the minds of negotiators. It’s not easy to say yes if persistent crowds shout no. It’s not easy to say no if pressure exerts itself on those selfsame people to say yes.

    It’s the same in the nation state at war. It’s a struggle to win hearts and minds over. It’s even more difficult as resources are focused on an enemy. Israel is as deeply set as Britain during its wars. The stories are similar. The military tactics are seen to be misguided in the short term. The goal of peace is still too far off.

    The historic support is in question too. In England, there is a lot of evidence to suggest people are misguided. The propaganda that festers in private residences and in secret community meetings says things are awry. The misgivings people have are fraught with mistakes. It’s a whitewash of current perceptions.

    The limits of diplomacy are not often seen. It’s not regularly explained in popular formats why it’s beyond our reach at times. The days of saying “Stop The War” have turned to “Stop The Genocide”, and yet neither are realistic. It remains that street politics is an art that has few points. It says very little.