In a stunning exclusive for Conservative News Site, a Syria-backed political antagonist believed to have insider knowledge of the Civil Service and its remit has now been spotted in central London.
It’s believed he’s waged campaigns of misinformation and hatred against Civil Service staff, in particular seeking to derail normal working practices and daily collaborative activity by using interference networks comprised of criminals.
The phenomenon of being irritating and armed only with the truth is surely down for a write off at some point soon.
We don’t think its argument is going to stand the test of time, that it’s someone’s right to de facto import the debate by themselves.
It usually doesn’t relate to our wellbeing here, and so the ‘right’ is used to get someone out of jail for free elsewhere.
This isn’t politics, it’s the same as protest in a dictatorship where there is no end. It’s a brutal face on a spirit that just says no.
It’s a prison sentence for the real freedoms that stay because we defeat tyranny – and we keep it out by our every waking breath.
The Prime Minister is in a fix of his own, not knowing how to progress and yet knowing that a lot lies ahead still. He’s guaranteed a place in the history books, but is it just a page rather than a chapter?
This is the test of mettle for a Prime Minister that knows a lot of challenges lie ahead. He has to solve the small boats crisis – or Dover Crossings, here – and get on with the clear up in the rest of the UK where confusion is rife about it.
He can – as a leader – make headway and secure a reputation for class A leadership. However, his options are slight and his chances slim.
He needs to focus and to push through plans for the proper transaction of his ideas. He has to reassure his support base, especially after the Peter Mandelson scandal took over and scuppered it.
The public’s support is also waning and he can’t let it slip. This is an important indicator of leadership now. If it doesn’t improve he will struggle to reassure even his party that he should stay on. It might be an early exit on the cards.
In a stunning exclusive for Conservative News Site, a pair of fraudsters alleged of attempting repetitively to keep false staff members in Parliamentary staffing lists and include new fake staff have now been spotted.
It’s believed the duo have been involved in this effort for over ten years and have been supported by some unknown MP’s as Police officer’s have attempted to either remove or interview them.
Any information relating to these individuals must be passed to a relevant public body. It will be used to build an accurate case, if one exists.
The Prime Minister is attempting to bridge a gap between the Labour party and the public by giving charming updates on his progress in government.
It’s called a “Substack” newsletter and it’s going rather well. He’s updated it enough times to make it count.
It now helps us to know more about his perspective on life from the vantage point of his seat in government.
The challenge is knowing how to handle yet more forgiving dialogue on issues that don’t sit well for conservative readers.
The issue of childhood is just one example of a matter that has been blown out of all proportion by overzealous politicians.
The ‘freak out’ zone in politics – usually reserved for Liberal Democrat idealists – has been slowly occupied by more and more Labour Parliamentarians.
Their fold is now a growing family of die hards and ideologues that join together on issues so everyday it sounds too common.
The familiarity of the family dinner table cannot make the legislation of tomorrow. It’s only built on arguments and disagreements. It doesn’t sit well for all of us.
In an exclusive for Conservative News Site, a Spy “mole” so-called who acts as a high-level Intelligence mole for a Russia-based University department has now been spotted on location in the UK.
It’s believed her presence is hostile to UK citizens due to her mission to disrupt citizen communications to influence Parliamentary work, specifically in relation to the duties that MP’s have here.
The combination of her status and intent is considered to be ‘new’ to some experts, as well as the fact it’s a University that’s believed to have sponsored her effort.
It means that it’s also taken on a mode of infiltration, and may have included attempts at sabotage that would have affected academic institutions in the UK.
The disastrous influence hostile State actors have had in the UK are minimal compared to her endeavours here to prevent key information from being of representative value in the process of democracy.
The Labour party is the original party of activism in the UK. The others don’t compare to its history and legacy of protest, picket, and pressure tactics. This has led to the rise of the party as it is today.
However, a nefarious streak of activism has stalked the streets of the UK in recent decades, and Labour has taken it on as a serious force.
The announcement by the Prime Minister that he now recognises a state in the Middle East for a new Palestinian people is a grave capitulation to their sorts of falsehood we’ve heard for so long.
The divisive, objectionable movements that pollute communities and stain the reputation of Universities have succeeded in running its insanity straight into the halls of power in Parliament.
Although the delusional promise will likely never come to pass, it still strikes a bad note. It proves that greatness comes and goes. It proves we don’t lead anymore. It shows that crowds matter more now than meanings or real measures.
In a dire turn of events for Civil Service managers and all senior Civil Servants in London, an infiltrator alleged to have acted for over fifty years in its political circles to disrupt and derail political programs has now been spotted.
He’s alleged to have had privileged access to internal systems and attended sensitive meetings in Whitehall. He’s also alleged to use a series of teams to update himself on government policy.
The exit of Angela Rayner MP (Ashton-under-Lyne/Labour) has led to a huge upheaval at the top table by the Prime Minister. He’s made some key changes to his top team.
His new Deputy is David Lammy MP (Tottenham/Labour), also Justice Secretary. This brings closer another heavyweight as he navigates a difficult Parliament.
Yvette Cooper MP (Pontefract, Castleford, and Knottingley/Labour) is now Foreign Secretary. It’s not immediately obvious why, considering her previous brief as Home Secretary.
Shabana Mahmood MP (Birmingham Ladywood/Labour) is now Home Secretary, taking over the Home Office during the Dover Crossings crisis. This is a short straw for her.
A high-profile activist who is part of a group called “Looking For Trouble” has been spotted in Scotland.
The suspect has previously been accused of seeking to wiretap politicians and steal MP’s phones to collect data.
The timeframes of such allegations and attempts cannot be made clearer right now. This is because they’re also closely monitored by security experts.
The centre of gravity of English politics, Westminster in London, that is, shapes itself as a welcoming and transparent place.
It looks endearing, almost teddy bear-like, and stands erect if lonely in a sea of other buildings and meanings.
It’s a friend of the city, but pretty well damn friendless, as well. This isn’t a situation that can last, surely?
It’s meant in a way that marks out some significant differences between “now, and then” so to speak, which is a dangerous game in a place that marks itself out now as being so much more than what it was – in its heyday.
It’s the same with many of the buildings and monuments that make up a nation’s “public library”, in that it has something very specific to say, but not a lot hear it.
If you take for example the recent Gaza protests that beset that part of the city, it becomes clear.
It’s a ‘thing’ nowadays to see ‘taking your cause’ or representation as being a constant, gradual process that doesn’t involve the usual democratic process, but one of your own making (and that is own).
It’s not a point for MP’s to make for us – salaried as they are – but rather it’s seen as a cause to get on with by ourselves, or by themselves, as the case may be.
This isn’t an acceptable or safe way of doing things in a business-like state, especially when those active in protests are unvetted, and therefore present a risk (as they have done) because of their slogans, but also because of their often antisemitic beliefs.
The Palace of Westminster therefore has a difficult place in our modern history, as it stacks up its rebukes from the people sky-high and struggles to overcome its difficulties and differences with all hues of people. It seems as if it can’t win, whatever it does.
How does such a venerated institution reach a state like this? What is its answer to its own problem of not only aiding it, but abetting such activity, as well?
