It’s believed Boris Johnson is due to appear on GB News as a guest contributor, but the questions about this arrangement are beginning to sound alarm.
It’s believed by some in media roles in London that Johnson was paid £300,000 by GB News to shut Russia Today in favour of its slot.
This amounts to corruption if it’s true, although some have also said that it only counts as his signing up fee for his new role. It’s allegedly not an easy rumour to avoid.
In an exclusive for Conservative News Site, a Russian asset believed to be in control of “Thames Water” and other UK-based companies has now been spotted.
A suspected Russian asset alleged of serious crime in business environs in the UK.
He’s alleged to physically threaten corporate directors, investigators, and suppliers. This happens if they show concern about the activity of his entities.
In time the fact of corruption comes to the surface. It’s got to. It’s suspicion. It’s curiosity. It’s confusion. It gets the better of us. It results in a need to know. The result is intelligence.
Policing corruption: Five indicative names.
In London, it’s been suspected Policing “gangs” have ruled small parts of it. It probably isn’t true. It’s more likely they act alone. It’s unlikely they’re gangs. It’s safer to be circumspect.
It’s hidden. They wear a uniform. They have no pride. It makes them feel shame. Their cause is selfish. They just want more. It may be cash. It may be control. It may be power.
In an exclusive for ConservativeNewsSite.com, a pro-Russian psyop has been located and stopped due to intense surveillance activity. It occurred over a period of time and involved many actors.
The starting point is a basis of rudimental activity relating to policy proposals, criticism in the press, and media output in the UK. The intention was to disrupt by misrepresenting the UK’s status.
Video footage
The use of a dissident is likely to be the main focus of this sort of operation. It means he or she are not under the implicit command of an overseas power, but are still loyal in their business activity.
Photo evidence
The likely intent had been to use an “Agent” who would seek to use local knowledge to infiltrate meetings, public places of importance, and people’s diaries. He would do it to plant or place opinions.
The outcome may have been inaccurate use of data, insufficient provision of public services, and discord in society. It may have been meant to destabilise the state. The intent needs further investigation.