Background
Thames House came under unwarranted siege. There was no forewarning from any Military personnel. It fact, it’s believed reports with warnings were suppressed.
Perpetrators
The guilty suspects were ordinary civilians from a number of different workplaces. The plan was concocted by recruitment staff from a wide variety of agencies.
Argument
A routine inquiry by an MI5 agent led to suspicions the building had been put under siege inside of it. A further cursory investigation made clear staff were also taken hostage.
Plan
The culprits had planned to defraud UK-based businesses. They locked down the building to make ransom requests. They carried out these threats on foot in the city.
Threat
The nature of the attack meant working was erratic. It led to significant operational difficulties. It meant agents in the field had setbacks. It threatened staffing morale.



