Advertisements

Sufferings at the top

There isn’t a great deal good to write about the English monarchy these days.

If it isn’t cash scandals, sex abroad, or a kind of indifference that doesn’t fit it may be a kind of richness, pleasure, and luxury that exceeds the lifestyle’s of most people.

It’s irrelevant of course that a nation can’t be built on sheds but you’d think so if you travelled deep into the English countryside. Deep in there you’ll find sky high notions of critique of any royal order or political regime now or back in the past.

They’ve got opinions and maps and charts to suit. It doesn’t matter who I or you are it matters that we’ve got it and they don’t like it. Alternatively, it’s just the idea they’ve got in their heads.

In actuality deep derision breeds division and this leads to anarchy as it does.

In English royalty there’s a thing about not stating a fact too quickly. It harms intellect (thought, in other words) and stops good ideas from coming forth after acrimony is dealt with. It’s important to deal with things or they don’t get done.

In the recent past the English monarchy has suffered setbacks.

It isn’t easy to say why because issues are pressing and situations are ongoing. It matters to say what however because it settles most criticisms quickly and lets older statesmen take control.

The point is not that a junior member of the royal family suffered abduction on numerous occasions. It’s not that money was stolen and later recovered. It’s not that entire buildings came under siege.

It’s that all of it happened under the watch of the English people and because of the people here. They had made mistakes and just didn’t take enough care over it.