Russia is sending its people online to boast about its fortunes. This is the conclusion to seeing live shows presented by citizens that may be Russian military personnel. The value in doing it is perceived to be a boost to reputation – and morale.
This is key for the Russian army. It needs to present a living attitude, or standard, so-called that brings to mind a modern Russia that supports its citizens. However, as more people die on the frontlines such tactics look increasingly desperate.
The activity of pro-Russian activists is reaching new heights. This is because of a renewed push to increase influence abroad.
It’s done by Russians looking to serve their country by a blend of information and technology.
It’s usually easy enough to complete. The user just needs a smart device like a phone or tablet and a solid Internet connection.
The rest is guided or “coached” by a fellow citizen. Their job is to help them to begin their journey as a servant of the State anywhere in the world.
Their progress is slow to begin with because the effort needs to be built up – and they have to prove their loyalty. Yet it’s now proved that many keep to it.
They begin to enable further spying operations and increased coverage for Russia. This is surveillance upscaling on the cheap.
The other side of the process – that of the operator – is far removed from the world of the helping hand who is expected to work hard.
They’re usually happy at first to get paid for doing it, especially as the cost of living internationally increases exponentially.
However, it proves to be back breaking. The long hours are off putting and the pay rises are not forthcoming.
Their handlers are often ‘pushy’ types and have a tendency to shout or be aggressive. It’s difficult to keep going if their country is also being abusive in their direction.
However, the urge to do it beats a desire to protest. There’s now evidence of extensive attempts to cover whole cities in the West. It employs thousands.
The Piratka group on Telegram is a good example of what it’s like for a new user. This one is about counter-Intelligence.
It features film posters and posts in Russian illustrative of the type of approach the ‘handler’ wants from their students.
It’s alleged the technique is derogatory toward those who work in Intelligence in the UK, and other European nations.
The student is meant to despise it and put it down as nefarious behaviour dressed up to be expert. This diminishes confidence.
The denial of dignity and erosion of professionalism is a typical starting point for some pro-Russian groups active in the West.
This “Training Platform” method is roughly populated by material from manuals individuals get as part of their own training by the Russian state.
Their approach is not necessarily controlled but the outcomes are. These are set and directed by those in Russian spying bodies. They want to see targets met.
All they have to do is find creative ways of communicating their directives without drawing strong interest. It’s to avoid so-called ‘censors’ in the West.
However, albeit the posts are not straightforward calls to execute citizens, the intent is to glorify Russia and promote its aims.
The stages beyond are more detailed and can be more disruptive. If there’s not more Policing of such infiltration of our streets, the results may be seen in our daily lives.
The Russia that we know of is not as historical as we presume, that’s if your dealings with it are purely on its modern terms. The Presidency of Russia is known as technically advanced for example, and it has a tight grip on the Russian people. Its level of control is far higher than in other Western democracies.
However, the Russian state itself is still riven with desires for older times or more brutal control. There are competing factions that want different forms of Presidency, but these are ideals for a dictatorship and not a more open rule.
The rumours swirl around the Kremlin, the seat of its power, that Putin has faced tumultuous times in his terms. These include his family disappearing from view, attempts at takeover, and internal conflict. This is not flattering for an administration of public relations.
Russia says its invasion of Ukraine is to stop a threat to its own national security. However, it’s not just a violation of sovereign territory, but it’s also a call for the cessation of a democratic Ukraine. To many Ukrainians, democracy is still new there and it threatens it.
It’s accepted the uncertainty of it is far removed from the problems of other Western powers. The bombardment isn’t like a volley of awkward questions from reporters. It’s more of a fundamental test of resolve. It challenges – and reshapes – national character.
Putin’s challenge in the effort is a zero-sum game in his eyes. He doesn’t see compromise as necessary to a victory, and agreements may threaten to diminish potential outcomes. It’s a war of perfect returns. He wants a safer Russia and this is how he gets it.
The Russian state is a large, complex modern drama that blends politics and deep heritage. However, its mixed blessing even for the Russian people is a curse for the rest of us. It doesn’t lay straight lines for diplomacy as much as it bends and breaks the rules by it.
The Ukraine-Russia war is a part of the takeover of the modern Russian mindset by strong Presidents. They love an assertive platform in public. They sabre rattle at their neighbours – who are also now all perceived as enemies.
The Putin-Trump summit isn’t the only way to do it. If the UN hadn’t of berated Israel so much, it might have taken a chance to intervene. It might still have to.
The problem in international affairs is finding time. There isn’t scope to regret and forget so quickly. The short-term lives on for longer than people think.
The Israel-Gaza conflict is clearly taking up time – and leading to precious few results. The pressing matter of peace in Europe is taking up American hours.
It’s the wrong way to do it. The right path is to let peace come by fair means set out for the benefit of the international community. It has to rest on all of us.
In an exclusive for Conservative News Site, a spy for Russia has been spotted in Reading, Berkshire.
He’s alleged to research ports and some Naval dockyards, and other sites of interest to UK maritime activity.
It’s believed Russia is spying on Navies and surveying all sea routes. It may have an economic aspect to it.
It’s thought to relate to sabotage, and not to new business or commercial activity. Russia is known to antagonise this.
Russia is wrong. Putin is selfish. He’s invading sovereign territory. His views are old fashioned. His motive is not crystal clear. He wants to rule a democratic nation. He wants to bait Europe at its doorstep. He’s looking for fights.
His map is wrong. He doesn’t see the spread of freedom. He doesn’t value elections. He doesn’t regard new parties. He doesn’t note changes in societies. He ignores all this for his own agenda. It’s a poor vision of a dark future.
In an exclusive for Conservative News Site, a so-called “Controller” in Russian media circles, also believed to be behind multiple attempts at sabotage in UK media, is pictured here for the first time.
It’s believed the suspect, nicknamed Sergei, is an expert at research and also derives sensitive cultural information for use in Russian institutions. He’s said to harm specific UK-based media staff.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is reported to have said gay relationships are not anti-Russian.
According to RIA Novosti news agency, Putin meant “non-traditional” relationships cannot be taught to children.
His comment is clear. Yet it ignores state involvement in political organisation.
Putin says he protects Russia by stopping children being taught it in schools, yet gay movements often organise to protect their own existence.
The balance of contradictions is a strained act by a war-minded President.
It’s going around online on official accounts that Russia has now lost over one million of its military personnel. This is a crude ‘milestone’ it didn’t want to hit and has done so in a reckless war.
Putin is now risking his nation’s future by ploughing more lives into a pointless conflict. In Western terms he stands to gain absolutely nothing. He’s not seen as a legitimate leader and he doesn’t have a case for invading Ukraine either.
The limitations of a Russian win are now clear. It wouldn’t be recognised internationally. His conflict is already seen as a distraction on an international scene that’s too busy. He’s fighting for old ideas in a world of new values.
His Russia is increasingly slipping backwards. It’s stuck in a regressive dream. It wants more than it can bargain for. Its negotiations with Ukraine shows it needs to retreat and give up. Its enemy is wiling to dialogue because it’s confident it will end.
Putin needs to count his losses and leave early. His Presidency is already in a type of decline. It’s not easy to believe in national pride as more and more of your compatriots are lost. He needs to regain ground by calling a ceasefire.
The strikes on Russian aircraft in Siberia rocked the elite in Russia, as it should. Ukraine pulled out a win against a self-confident state. The Goliath factor is no more.
However, Moscow has room for manoeuvre. Its military is strong. It has public support for its territorial integrity. Essentially, Russians feel anything is legitimate.
Moscow’s leadership needs to strategise. The future is bleak if it loses. President Putin looks weaker. It may seek his removal if things stay like this for much longer.
Any reaction is strong, but it has to work. Ukraine is seeking the end of a conflict. It’s unpredictable. The next tipping of the balance may make or break the battle itself.
There’s such a thing as influence in politics, but usually real activity counts. It’s what I’ve heard from a few grandees in Parliamentary circles. They know real events get things done.
It’s what MP’s work at constantly.
However, bad state actors try their luck too, and their hand is to influence. This is the attempt to effect change minus the input.
They lack the potential of election, and another method is needed.
I heard of Radio Therapy, a “Political Influence” program run by Russia years ago. It ran in close quarters to Ministers.
The aim had been to effect changes to policy proposals, to see what advantages could be had by it in the UK.
The dangers are clear. It replaces citizenship. It hinders the work of the Civil Service. It disrupts ordinary progress in parties. It distorts the outcomes of any attempt at policy formation.
It must be fought off at every turn.
In an exclusive for ConservativeNewsSite.com, a Russian Agent believed to work in media circles has been spotted in Reading, Berkshire.
She was loitering near to a media crew, and a public drinking venue in the centre of the town.
Any information relating to this individual must be passed to a relevant public body. It will be used to build an accurate case, if one exists.